Okay, I need to talk about something slightly embarrassing.
You know when you want something for ages? A job, a degree, a flat, a number on a scale, a ring, a visa, whatever. You think about it constantly. You imagine the moment you finally get it. In your head there’s a soundtrack, maybe slow motion, and you’re crying the pretty kind of tears.
And then it actually happens. And you feel… fine?
Like, nice. A bit proud. You post the photo, people comment the champagne emoji, your mum calls. And by Monday you’re sitting on the sofa thinking, “Okay. Now what?”
Nobody warns you about this. Every film ends at the moment of getting the thing. The credits roll right as she gets the job or he gets the girl.
Nobody shows you the Monday.
So my question is: why do I feel nothing when I finally get what I wanted? Or not nothing, but so much less than I expected?
If you’d asked me a few years ago, I’d have had a very confident diagnosis:
I’m ungrateful. Spoilt, even. One of those people who’s never happy, the kind your aunt warns everyone about at weddings.
Or maybe I wanted the wrong thing all along, and the flatness is my body’s way of saying “babe, this was never it.”
Which, to be fair, is sometimes true. But it happens with things I really, genuinely wanted, and it happens to almost everyone I know. So either we’re all broken, or something else is going on.
So I went looking for older, sadder men who’d already thought about it.
And no one is older and sadder than Arthur Schopenhauer. Nineteenth-century German, famously grumpy, lived alone with a series of poodles, all of which he apparently named Atma. This man was not a party.
But on this one, he’s weirdly comforting. Schopenhauer thought human life basically swings like a pendulum between two states. When you want something and don’t have it, you suffer: that’s desire, the itch. When you finally get it, the itch stops, and almost immediately you’re bored. Then a new want shows up, and off you swing again.
That’s it. That’s the whole human condition according to Schopenhauer. Pain, boredom, pain, boredom, with a few seconds of relief in between.
And honestly? Reading that, I laughed. Because it’s bleak, but it’s also exactly right. The best feeling was never having the job. It was the morning I got the email. The ring isn’t the high, the question is.
The moment of arrival is a doorway, not a room you get to live in.
So according to Schopenhauer, feeling flat after a milestone doesn’t mean I’m broken. It means I’m a functioning human being with a desire system doing exactly what it was built to do: reach the thing, then go looking for the next one.
Which is a relief. But also kind of depressing? I don’t want to live on a pendulum. So I kept reading.
Then I found Tolstoy, and he made me feel so much better. Not because he had the answer, but because if this man felt flat, then nobody’s safe.
Picture Leo Tolstoy around 1879. He’s about fifty. He’s already written War and Peace and Anna Karenina, so he’s not just a successful writer, he’s probably the most famous novelist alive. He owns a huge estate. He has a wife, a big family, money, health, respect. If there were a checklist of milestones for nineteenth-century Russian men, he’d ticked every box and invented a few new ones.
And right then, at the absolute peak, something weird starts happening. In the middle of normal life, he keeps getting stopped by one tiny question:
And what then?
He wrote about it later in a short book called A Confession, and it’s almost funny how relatable it is. He’d be thinking about his estate, how many horses he’d have, how much land, and a voice would ask: fine, and what then? He’d think about his books, how he’d be more famous than Gogol, Pushkin, Shakespeare, Molière, every writer who ever lived, and the voice would ask again: fine, and what then?
And he had no answer. None. The man who basically had everything, and every single item on the list just led to another “and then?”
He describes it with an old Eastern fable that I can’t stop thinking about. A traveller, running from a wild animal, jumps into a dry well. At the bottom there’s a dragon waiting for him, so he grabs a branch halfway down and hangs there. Two mice, one black, one white, are slowly chewing through the branch. And on the leaves there are a few drops of honey, so he licks them, because what else is he going to do.
For Tolstoy, the honey was everything he’d achieved: the books, the family, the fame. And the problem wasn’t that the honey was gone. It was that it had stopped tasting sweet.
Which is, I think, the most elegant description of a promotion ever written.
Tolstoy’s crisis went much deeper than mine ever will. It took him years, and it changed his whole life. But what I took from him is simple. The flatness after getting the thing isn’t a sign you picked the wrong thing. It happened to a man who picked all the right things. It’s a sign you were secretly hoping the thing would answer a question it was never designed to answer.
Schopenhauer explains why the high fades. Tolstoy shows that even the most perfect list doesn’t fix it. So, fine. And what then?
That’s where Aristotle comes in. He saw all of this coming about 2,300 years ago, and his answer is so simple it’s almost annoying.
Everyone, he says, agrees that the goal of life is happiness. The Greek word is eudaimonia, which means something closer to “living well” or “flourishing” than “feeling happy.” But people disagree massively about what it actually is. Some think it’s pleasure. Some think it’s money. Some think it’s honour, being admired. In other words: the milestones.
And Aristotle says: no. Happiness isn’t something you get. It’s something you do.
For him it’s an activity. Living well, using your abilities, doing things that are worth doing, with people worth doing them with, day after day. It isn’t a trophy you collect at the end. It’s more like being fit. You can’t get fit once and then keep it in a drawer. You are fit because of what you keep doing.
And then he adds one of my favourite lines in all of philosophy:
“One swallow does not make a summer, nor does one day.”
One good day, one big moment, one champagne emoji, doesn’t make a happy life. A happy life is made of all the ordinary days in between.
And that’s when it clicked for me. I’d been treating milestones like destinations. Get the job, then I’ll be happy. Finish the degree, then. Move to the city, then. And when I arrived, there was no “there” there, because according to Aristotle, there never is. Happiness isn’t a place you get to. It’s the way you travel.
He even explains why the moment of achieving something feels better than actually having it. Pleasure, he says, isn’t a separate prize. It comes with an activity done well, and he compares it to the bloom on someone’s cheeks when they’re young and healthy. It’s not the point. It’s what shows up when you’re doing the point.
So the high you get when the email arrives is real. It’s the bloom on the effort: all those months of working, hoping, trying. When the effort stops, the bloom fades. Not because you’re broken, but because the thing producing it just ended.
So. Why do I feel nothing when I finally get what I wanted?
Here’s where I’ve landed. Schopenhauer’s right that wanting feels more intense than having: we’re built like that, and it’s not a personal flaw. Tolstoy’s right that no list of achievements can answer the big question, not even his list, and his list was ridiculous. And Aristotle’s right that I was looking in the wrong place. The milestone was never going to be the happy part. The happy part was the doing.
Which honestly takes some of the pressure off. It means the flat feeling after a big moment isn’t a failure. It’s just the end of a chapter, and a nudge to ask a better question. Not “what’s the next thing I want to get?” but “what do I want to keep doing?”
The job won’t make you happy. Doing work you care about, with people you like, might. The degree won’t. Being someone who keeps learning might. The new city won’t. Building a life there, one boring Monday at a time, might.
So next time I get the thing I’ve been chasing and feel weirdly flat, I’m going to try not to panic.
I’ll enjoy the honey for a minute. Then I’ll remember the swallow, and go back to building the summer.
“The moment of arrival is a doorway, not a room you get to live in.”
Okay, I need to talk about something slightly embarrassing.
You know when you want something for ages? A job, a degree, a flat, a number on a scale, a ring, a visa, whatever. You think about it constantly. You imagine the moment you finally get it. In your head there’s a soundtrack, maybe slow motion, and you’re crying the pretty kind of tears.
And then it actually happens. And you feel… fine?
Like, nice. A bit proud. You post the photo, people comment the champagne emoji, your mum calls. And by Monday you’re sitting on the sofa thinking, “Okay. Now what?”
Nobody warns you about this. Every film ends at the moment of getting the thing. The credits roll right as she gets the job or he gets the girl.
Nobody shows you the Monday.
So my question is: why do I feel nothing when I finally get what I wanted? Or not nothing, but so much less than I expected?
If you’d asked me a few years ago, I’d have had a very confident diagnosis:
I’m ungrateful. Spoilt, even. One of those people who’s never happy, the kind your aunt warns everyone about at weddings.
Or maybe I wanted the wrong thing all along, and the flatness is my body’s way of saying “babe, this was never it.”
Which, to be fair, is sometimes true. But it happens with things I really, genuinely wanted, and it happens to almost everyone I know. So either we’re all broken, or something else is going on.
So I went looking for older, sadder men who’d already thought about it.
And no one is older and sadder than Arthur Schopenhauer. Nineteenth-century German, famously grumpy, lived alone with a series of poodles, all of which he apparently named Atma. This man was not a party.
But on this one, he’s weirdly comforting. Schopenhauer thought human life basically swings like a pendulum between two states. When you want something and don’t have it, you suffer: that’s desire, the itch. When you finally get it, the itch stops, and almost immediately you’re bored. Then a new want shows up, and off you swing again.
That’s it. That’s the whole human condition according to Schopenhauer. Pain, boredom, pain, boredom, with a few seconds of relief in between.
And honestly? Reading that, I laughed. Because it’s bleak, but it’s also exactly right. The best feeling was never having the job. It was the morning I got the email. The ring isn’t the high, the question is.
The moment of arrival is a doorway, not a room you get to live in.
So according to Schopenhauer, feeling flat after a milestone doesn’t mean I’m broken. It means I’m a functioning human being with a desire system doing exactly what it was built to do: reach the thing, then go looking for the next one.
Which is a relief. But also kind of depressing? I don’t want to live on a pendulum. So I kept reading.
Then I found Tolstoy, and he made me feel so much better. Not because he had the answer, but because if this man felt flat, then nobody’s safe.
Picture Leo Tolstoy around 1879. He’s about fifty. He’s already written War and Peace and Anna Karenina, so he’s not just a successful writer, he’s probably the most famous novelist alive. He owns a huge estate. He has a wife, a big family, money, health, respect. If there were a checklist of milestones for nineteenth-century Russian men, he’d ticked every box and invented a few new ones.
And right then, at the absolute peak, something weird starts happening. In the middle of normal life, he keeps getting stopped by one tiny question:
And what then?
He wrote about it later in a short book called A Confession, and it’s almost funny how relatable it is. He’d be thinking about his estate, how many horses he’d have, how much land, and a voice would ask: fine, and what then? He’d think about his books, how he’d be more famous than Gogol, Pushkin, Shakespeare, Molière, every writer who ever lived, and the voice would ask again: fine, and what then?
And he had no answer. None. The man who basically had everything, and every single item on the list just led to another “and then?”
He describes it with an old Eastern fable that I can’t stop thinking about. A traveller, running from a wild animal, jumps into a dry well. At the bottom there’s a dragon waiting for him, so he grabs a branch halfway down and hangs there. Two mice, one black, one white, are slowly chewing through the branch. And on the leaves there are a few drops of honey, so he licks them, because what else is he going to do.
For Tolstoy, the honey was everything he’d achieved: the books, the family, the fame. And the problem wasn’t that the honey was gone. It was that it had stopped tasting sweet.
Which is, I think, the most elegant description of a promotion ever written.
Tolstoy’s crisis went much deeper than mine ever will. It took him years, and it changed his whole life. But what I took from him is simple. The flatness after getting the thing isn’t a sign you picked the wrong thing. It happened to a man who picked all the right things. It’s a sign you were secretly hoping the thing would answer a question it was never designed to answer.
Schopenhauer explains why the high fades. Tolstoy shows that even the most perfect list doesn’t fix it. So, fine. And what then?
That’s where Aristotle comes in. He saw all of this coming about 2,300 years ago, and his answer is so simple it’s almost annoying.
Everyone, he says, agrees that the goal of life is happiness. The Greek word is eudaimonia, which means something closer to “living well” or “flourishing” than “feeling happy.” But people disagree massively about what it actually is. Some think it’s pleasure. Some think it’s money. Some think it’s honour, being admired. In other words: the milestones.
And Aristotle says: no. Happiness isn’t something you get. It’s something you do.
For him it’s an activity. Living well, using your abilities, doing things that are worth doing, with people worth doing them with, day after day. It isn’t a trophy you collect at the end. It’s more like being fit. You can’t get fit once and then keep it in a drawer. You are fit because of what you keep doing.
And then he adds one of my favourite lines in all of philosophy:
“One swallow does not make a summer, nor does one day.”
One good day, one big moment, one champagne emoji, doesn’t make a happy life. A happy life is made of all the ordinary days in between.
And that’s when it clicked for me. I’d been treating milestones like destinations. Get the job, then I’ll be happy. Finish the degree, then. Move to the city, then. And when I arrived, there was no “there” there, because according to Aristotle, there never is. Happiness isn’t a place you get to. It’s the way you travel.
He even explains why the moment of achieving something feels better than actually having it. Pleasure, he says, isn’t a separate prize. It comes with an activity done well, and he compares it to the bloom on someone’s cheeks when they’re young and healthy. It’s not the point. It’s what shows up when you’re doing the point.
So the high you get when the email arrives is real. It’s the bloom on the effort: all those months of working, hoping, trying. When the effort stops, the bloom fades. Not because you’re broken, but because the thing producing it just ended.
So. Why do I feel nothing when I finally get what I wanted?
Here’s where I’ve landed. Schopenhauer’s right that wanting feels more intense than having: we’re built like that, and it’s not a personal flaw. Tolstoy’s right that no list of achievements can answer the big question, not even his list, and his list was ridiculous. And Aristotle’s right that I was looking in the wrong place. The milestone was never going to be the happy part. The happy part was the doing.
Which honestly takes some of the pressure off. It means the flat feeling after a big moment isn’t a failure. It’s just the end of a chapter, and a nudge to ask a better question. Not “what’s the next thing I want to get?” but “what do I want to keep doing?”
The job won’t make you happy. Doing work you care about, with people you like, might. The degree won’t. Being someone who keeps learning might. The new city won’t. Building a life there, one boring Monday at a time, might.
So next time I get the thing I’ve been chasing and feel weirdly flat, I’m going to try not to panic.
I’ll enjoy the honey for a minute. Then I’ll remember the swallow, and go back to building the summer.
“The moment of arrival is a doorway, not a room you get to live in.”